Comparison Of Various Programming Languages

Vaibhav Pandey

Student

Hey folks, I recently researched about various Programming Languages. Here I m going to discuss certain attributes of each language.

Basic
Year Introduced: 1964
Paradigm: Imperative, Procedural
Standardization: Yes, ANSI, ISO
Type Strength: Varies by dialect
Intended Use: Application, Education

C
Year Introduced: 1972
Paradigm: Imperative
Standardization: Yes, ANSI C89, ISO C90/C99
Type Strength: Weak
Intended Use: System

C++
Year Introduced: 1979
Paradigm: Imperative, Procedural, Object-oriented, Generic
Standardization: Yes, ISO
Type Strength: Strong
Intended Use: Application, System

C#
Year Introduced: 2000
Paradigm: Imperative, Object-oriented, Functional, Generic, Reflective
Standardization: Yes, ECMA, ISO
Type Strength: Strong
Intended Use: Application, Web

Haskell
Year Introduced: 1990
Paradigm: Functional, Generic, Lazy evaluation
Standardization: Yes, Haskell 98
Type Strength: Strong
Intended Use: Application

Java
Year Introduced: 1995
Paradigm: Imperative, Object-oriented, Generic, Reflective
Standardization: No
Type Strength: Strong
Intended Use: Application, Web

Perl
Year Introduced: 1987
Paradigm: Imperative, Procedural, Reflective, Functional, Object-oriented, Generic
Standardization: No
Type Strength: Weak
Intended Use: Application, Text processing, Scripting, Web

PHP
Year Introduced: 1995
Paradigm: Imperative, Procedural, Object-oriented, Reflective
Standardization: No
Type Strength: Weak
Intended Use: Web, Server-side

Python
Year Introduced: 1989
Paradigm: Imperative, Object-oriented, Functional, Aspect-oriented, Reflective
Standardization: No
Type Strength: Strong
Intended Use: Application, Scripting, Web

Scala
Year Introduced: 2003
Paradigm: Object-oriented, Functional, Generic, Lazy evaluation, Imperative
Standardization: No
Type Strength: Strong
Intended Use: Application, distributed computing

* * * * *