Cash or no cash have to pay tax
Last year, Surekha Saigal received a dazzling
jewellery-set worth Rs 2.2 lakh from her Dubai-based friend who was on a visit
to India. To her advantage, she was not liable to pay any tax on the gift she
received. But, come October 1, the tax laws would stand changed, making
individuals like Saigal or an HUF (Hindu Undivided Family) liable to pay tax on
receipts of any property (movable or immovable) or cash from non-relatives.
According to the new proposal of the Union Budget 2009-10, any property received from a non-relative where the value is in excess of Rs 50,000 in a particular year will be considered as income in the hands of the recipient.
Earlier, gifts in the form of cash from non-relatives were exempted up to a limit of Rs 50,000 a year (if sum exceeds Rs 50,000, then entire amount is eligible for being taxed). While this limit remains unchanged, the key change proposed is aimed at bringing in non-cash gifts into the tax ambit. Earlier, gifts in non-cash form (like shares and securities, jewellery, archeological collections, paintings and gold), even if they were in excess of Rs 50,000, were exempt from any tax in the hands of the recipient.
In case of immovable property, the value as determined by the stamp duty ready reckoner will be considered for tax purposes. However, an area of concern remains, which is the valuation part. Gautam Naik, partner, Contractor, Naik & Kishnadwala, said: “The ‘fair market value’ of a property other than immovable property could become an area of contention — for example, there could be valuation issues in case of a property, like a piece of painting. However, though the CBDT would prescribe the rules for valuation of other properties, there could be disputes on valuation. In case of immovable property, the issue is that it would tantamount to double taxation (Section 50C taxes capital gains in the hands of the seller, while the new proposal would tax the difference between stamp duty value and consideration in the hands of the purchaser).”
In case of transactions involving immovable property but wherein a consideration is involved, the amount eligible for being taxed would be the difference between the stamp duty value and the consideration paid (for other movable property, the ‘fair market value’ would be considered as against stamp duty).
According to the new proposal of the Union Budget 2009-10, any property received from a non-relative where the value is in excess of Rs 50,000 in a particular year will be considered as income in the hands of the recipient.
Earlier, gifts in the form of cash from non-relatives were exempted up to a limit of Rs 50,000 a year (if sum exceeds Rs 50,000, then entire amount is eligible for being taxed). While this limit remains unchanged, the key change proposed is aimed at bringing in non-cash gifts into the tax ambit. Earlier, gifts in non-cash form (like shares and securities, jewellery, archeological collections, paintings and gold), even if they were in excess of Rs 50,000, were exempt from any tax in the hands of the recipient.
In case of immovable property, the value as determined by the stamp duty ready reckoner will be considered for tax purposes. However, an area of concern remains, which is the valuation part. Gautam Naik, partner, Contractor, Naik & Kishnadwala, said: “The ‘fair market value’ of a property other than immovable property could become an area of contention — for example, there could be valuation issues in case of a property, like a piece of painting. However, though the CBDT would prescribe the rules for valuation of other properties, there could be disputes on valuation. In case of immovable property, the issue is that it would tantamount to double taxation (Section 50C taxes capital gains in the hands of the seller, while the new proposal would tax the difference between stamp duty value and consideration in the hands of the purchaser).”
In case of transactions involving immovable property but wherein a consideration is involved, the amount eligible for being taxed would be the difference between the stamp duty value and the consideration paid (for other movable property, the ‘fair market value’ would be considered as against stamp duty).
|
|
