The MBA Admissions Process: Giving Eyesight to the blind
The MBA admissions process seems
straight forward initially. Take a standardized test that is scored out of 800
(called the GMAT), write some essays, fill out your career
background, harass you superiors into signing their names on the letters of
recommendations which you will probably write yourself, and launch yourself
into the alternative universe of value-added, leveraged synergies of capacity
building, gap analysis of MBA’s. However, working with friends and clients on
their applications, has made me realize what a bewildering process this can be.
My work with a friend of a friend who is an architect interested in an MBA
underscored how oblique the MBA application questions can be. Her career called
for showing her design talents but how would that go over in a more
conservative MBA environment? It was safe for her to understand the
standardized test was important but what about the other parts of the
application? Is it the essays, recommendations, visits to the school, or
business background? How much math do you need to meet the threshold? What
about the structure of the resume and content? For the interview, are you asked
questions about your favorite investment strategy or what Civil War general
would you most like to face in battle? Here are some of the reasons why the MBA
admission process can be so daunting:
It’s a trade degree without a license: An MBA is a professional degree
that is designed to teach you a trade. However, it is one of the few
professional degrees that does not license or certify you to practice that
trade. Anyone can do business so an MBA just teaches you how to do business
better (in theory). It teaches a body of knowledge that is intended to be
developed enough so that it can be successfully applied. It does not intend to
teach a body of knowledge that will be researched further or for its graduates
to follow and perfect this body of knowledge.
Since it’s a trade degree that doesn’t license you to do anything, how do you
know that you even need one, let alone how do you demonstrate that you need one
to an admissions committee? That’s an important thing to know as every program
asks you why you want an MBA in some form or another.
No barriers to entry yet very high bars to hurdle: If you’re a really
good yakhereder that developed a process improvement to help baby yak’s nurse
and did a business plan to sell yak milk over the internet, can you get an MBA?
Looks good, but have you taken any math classes? How about volunteer
experience? Did you visit the schools or talk to alumni? Why not a masters in
animal husbandry? How many years of yak herding experience do you have? Is 2
years of experience too few or is 6 years too many? Does your background add
diversity or was the spider monkey breeder who was admitted last year
sufficient? Any career background can get admitted but it is difficult to gauge
how much background you need to hurdle over the requirements for math,
extracurricular activities, school visits, or other factors that could impact
your application. It's also difficult to determine which of those factors are
really important (the important factors are GMAT and grades to show you can
handle the academics, then work experience, quality of it, essays, and
extracurriculars roughly in that order. Everything else is lipstick) As a
result, everyone has a shot but it’s really hard to tell if you are really a
good candidate.
Oh, if my example helps, if the yakherder can get a 680 or higher on the GMAT
or did well academically in a prestigious school, they are in. A funky career
background with demonstrated success must be paired with proven academic skills
for a likely admission. Otherwise, no admissions officer wants to advocate
strongly for the guy who might still use an abacus in class.
Admissions officers have to guess: This is paired with the last example
where admissions officers truly don’t know if you have a decent chance of
getting in without seeing your complete application and really no one else does
either. Except for the letters of recommendations, it all really might matter.
While we would like admissions to draw a stronger line in the sand, they really
can’t. A candidate only might have finally broken 400 on the GMAT since they
just filled out all choice C’s out of desperation but what if they taught capitalism
to their hunting and gathering community that previous relied on bartering
sheep ankle bones? That’s why an admissions officer can’t say that there is no
chance of being admitted without a GMAT that is at least high enough that if it
were a credit score, you would be approved for a subprime loan.
As for the friend in architecture, I told her that you can never go wrong with
a conservative appearance but there are plenty of opportunities to blow it if
you get funky. That’s probably true for any part of your MBA application.
|