The New Employment Guarantee Scheme – A Radical Deal for India’s Poor”
Unemployment is the most important neglected and the burning problem of our country. Due to rapid growth of population, every year, a large number of unemployed educated and uneducated youths come out in search of suitable employment. According to late president of India
V.V. Giri , “Unemployment is the problem of problems. Unemployment has made our youths Naxalites. Educated youths are deprived of all deserving comforts and their growing discontentment has given scope for the speedy growth of Naxalism.” It is the basic problem which has given birth to a number of disconnected problems, such as, poverty, social disorder , insecurity, maintenance of law and order etc. As a matter of fact, it is the prime duty of the Planning commission and the Government to provide suitable jobs to all those who are unemployed .But it is a matter of great regret that both of them have badly failed on this vital front. In a sense it is a colossal waste of human resources which further hurdles the tempo of economic development of a country. Since it is a basic problem of the country, it calls for an immediate remedial action at the earliest possible time before it is too late.
Nature of unemployment in India
The problem of unemployment in
But in a country like
EXTENT AND MAGNITUDE OF UNEMPLOYEMNT
Due to conceptual and statistical difficulties, the estimates of unemployment and under employment both in rural and urban areas are neither accurate nor reliable.
A Large number of worker in
The difference between the two seems to rest on the duration of unemployment at a stretch. As a matter of fact, neither the Planning Commission, nor Census Report , nor Director-General of Employment and Training ( D.G.E.T.) nor the Employment Exchange or ISI or the National Sample Survey Organization (N.S.S.O.) could give any dependable quantitative estimates of the magnitude of the problem .
The Task Force headed by Dr, Montek Singh Ahluwalia in its report of June 2001 adopted UPSS concept; while Special Group in the chairman ship of Dr. S.P. Gupta in its report of May 2002 adopted CDS concept .
As per the Task Force Report unemployment rate in India in 1999- 2000 was 2.2% (U.P.S.S. concept); while according to Special Group Report given in May 2002 it was 7.32% (CDS concept) Unemployment rates for the same states for 1993-94 and 1999-2000 (unemployed persons as ratio of labour force) are shown in the Table No. 1,along with employment- elasticity between 1993-94 to 1999-2000 (employment-growth rate divided by/GDP growth rate during this period )
The table explains that unemployment situation in Kerala, TamilNadu and
The number of unemployed in India increased from 2.01 crore in 1993-94 to 2.66 crore in 1999-2000 (Table no 2).The labour force in 1999-2000 was about 363.33 million (36.33 crore).The labour force in 2006-07 is likely to be 413.50 million (41.35 crore) on the assumptions that it will grow at the rate of 1.8% per annum during 10th plan period. In 2006-07, unemployment rate is likely to be 9.79% , and the number of unemployed to be 21.2 million (2.12 crore). The share of organized sector in employment is about 8%, while that of unorganized sector it is 92% in
Employment program for rural sector
As discussed above there is open unemployment disguised unemployment and seasonal unemployment in India this has always being a great concern to the policy makers and they are continuously searching some ways and means to solve it . Productive absorption of underemployed and surplus labour force in the rural sector has been a major force for planning for rural development in order to provide direct supplementary wage employment to the rural poor through public works, many programs were initiated by the Govt. of India , namely, National Rural Employment Program (NREP) Rural Landless Employment Guarantee Programme (RLEGP) and Jwahar Rojgar Yojana (JRY).
Currently Sampoorna Gramin Rojgar Yojana is being implemented all over the country with the objective to provide supplementary wage employment in rural areas create durable rural infrastructure and to ensure food security. Though the SJRY is providing some relief to the rural poor, its reach has been inadequate in view of the dimension of the unemployment in rural areas.
It has been indicated in the statement of the object and reasons annexed to the bill that the scale of the unemployment generation under SGRY in 2002-03 and 2003-04 was barely adequate to provide on an average 20 days and employment to each Below Poverty Line(BPL) house hold in the rural areas. Secondly, there is no guarantee that employment will be available tot he rural hose on demand as SGRY is an allocation programme. The situation of unemployment has been compounded by the absence of any social security mechanism.
Taking into account of the experience of 30 years gained under the Employment Guarantee Scheme in Maharastra the Parliament has approved the National Rural Employemnt Bill, 2005 seeking to provide 100 days assured every year to every rural house hold in 200 district . This landmark legislation was past by LoakSabha on
The legislation constitute a pioneer endeavor to secure wage employment for the house holds in the rural areas as a guaranteed entitlement on this scale . the bill drafted after wide consultation fulful a measure promise of the UPA’s National Common Minimum Programme . The legislation has wide support among political parties, social movements and public at large.
Intervening at the debate on the bill in the Rajya sabha Prime Minister Dr , Manmohan Singh argued for rationalizing subsidies, improving the investment climate and accelerating the pace of inductralization to maintain the economic growth of 7 to 8% to fund scenmes such as Rural Employemnt guarantee. He described it as most important piece of legislation in independent
It is said that this legislation bill gives bargaining power to the poorest of the poor and help those belonging to the schedule caste, schedule tribes landless class and women’s. A gainful employment will be offered by this legislation to the poor which will fetch Rs. 500 per month for a family briging them in social safety. It is said that village Panchayat would play pivotal role in the implementation of the National Employment Guarantee Scheme . Initially, the scheme would be implemented in 200 district across the country which would be extended to 600 distt. 1/3rd of the proposed jobs would be reserved for women. The minimum wage as applicable in various states under the Minimum Wages Act 1948 would apply to the programmes. However the Centre would step into ensure a minimum rate of not less than Rs 60 a day in states, where it was lower . The minimmum wage offered for manual work in states currently varies from Rs25 Nagaland to Rs 134 in Kerela. The bill also provides for unemployment allowances if the job, under the scheme , is not provided within a specified period. The minimum daily wage has been fixed at Rs 60 .
In the current financial year Rs 10,000 crores have been made available for implementation the scheme . Considering that a programme of this kind being contemplated on such a massive scale for the first time, it has to be necessarily implemented in phases so as to eventually cover all rural areas of the countries subject to the economic capacity of the centre and the state Govt.
Salient Features of the Legislature
Some of the salient features of the legislation are that the State Government shall, in such rural areas in the state and for such period has may be notified by the central Govt. , provide to every household guaranteed wage employment in unskilled manual work at least for a period of 100 days in a financial year in accordance with the providence made in the legislation .This employment will be provided at the wage rate to be specified by the center Govtt. For a area, the wage rate fixed under the minimum wage act 1948 for agriculturer laborers shall be considered as the wage rate applicable to that area if this wage is not provided then it will be obligatory on the part of the state Govtt. To pay unemployment allowance at prescribed rate.
A central Employment Gurenatee Council at the central level and state Employement Gurenttee Council in all states where the legislation is made applicable will be constituted for review , monitoring and effective implementation of the legislation in there respective areas .
The Standing Committee of the Distt. Panchayat Distt. Programme Coordinator , Progrmamme officers and Gram Panchayats have been assigned specific responsibilities in implementation of various provisions of the legislations at the Gram Panchayats/ Block and Distt. Levels.
A National Employemnt Guarenttee fund will be established for this schem.
The state Govtt. may constitute state employment guarantee funds. Provisions for transparency and accountability, audit ,establishment of grievance and redressal mechanisms and penalty of non- compliance are also envisaged.
Conclusion
The problem of unemployment that exist in India today is the cumulative result of number of factors, namely Lopsided inadequate industrial development before independence, the rapid growth of population after 1921, the decay of small scale and cottage industries leading to greater pressure on land , the low level of investment resulting I lack of in expansion of the secondary and tertiary sectors of the Economy etc.
Unemployment can be removed by raising level of investment in the Indian Economy and accelerating the process of industrialization planning should also be employment oriented. Over and above without controlling the population the unemployment will continue.
The key to job guarantee legislation lies in the world guarantee;.
A guarantee seeks to take this power away from the hands of the politicians and their pretenders. It has the potential to profoundly alter the way bureaucrats treat the people they are supports to serve. The employment guarantee scheme will be different from the many employment generation programme . It is because they were implemented a programmes . Subject to budgetraty constraints and rules and regulations to suite implementing authorities. With the present bill, the states fulfill the right of the poor to be lively hood. Although implementation of employment guarantee progrmamme will require money but it saves social and economy cost of the poverty .
There is a genuine fear on large scale corruption in such progrmames , but the genuinely cannot be challenged on this ground .This bill would have to been seen against background of the improved Right to Information Act which would enable social audits and greater public scrutiny of the programmes. It will insure greater accountability of Panchyat bodies as Distt. Bodies as well now muster rolls will no longer be sacred and budget and works will in public knowledge all this will insure that only those who really need will employed , and only those schemes require by the committee are taken up.
(CDS basis) (SG Report, May 2002)
State |
Unemployment rate in 1999-2000 |
Unemploy-ment rate in 1999-2000 |
Employment elasticity during 1993-94 to 1999-2000 |
GDP Growth of 1993-94-1999-2000 | |
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Kerala Tamil Nadu U.P. M.P. Maharastra Orissa Rajasthan |
15.51 11.41 3.45 10.06 3.56 5.09 7.30 1.31 8.03 6.34 |
20.97 11.78 4.08 14.99 4.45 7.16 7.34 3.13 8.03 7.32 |
0.013 0.052 0.185 0.056 0.272 0.216 0.262 0.104 0.737 0.353 |
5.5 7.1 5.5 7.3 4.7 5.8 4.0 7.0 2.7 4.5 |
|
All |
5.99 |
7.32 |
0.160 |
6.7 |
EMPLOYEMENT SCENARIO FROM 8% GROWTH PER ANNUM
(Based on Actual Elasticity (1994-2000)- CDS 1.8% Per Annual Growth in L.F.)
|
Unit |
1999-2000 |
20011 |
20021 |
2007 |
2012 |
Employement Growth over 10th Plan per annum |
1.Labour Force 1.8% per annum growth 2. Employment2 3.Unemployment Rate 4.No.ofUnemployment |
Million Million (%) Million |
363.33 336.75 7.32 26.58 |
371.52 340.82 8.26 30.70 |
378.21 343.31 9.21 34.85 |
413.50 373.03 9.79 40.47 |
451.53 405.52 10.63
|