TWISTING OF FACTS
the case is heard by a special court to expedite the process of law which itself is being circumvented by the CM and her co accused for the case has been dragging for more than 11 years. The Special courts act 1979 is an act of parliament empowering governments to constitute special courts and sec 3 of the act stipulates such constitution of the courts need to be gazetted and not the appointment of the judges therein who are routinely nominated by the judiciary. The judge need to be a sessions judge in order to be eligible to sit in judgment. The bunch of cases that need to be heard also is decided by the appointing authority viz Centre or State governments. This new stand of Lawyers of the CM ( probably the legal luminary Cho Ramaswamy could have given this idea to his closest friend) after the case has been heard for 11 years is a mockery of the judicial process. It is high time Supreme Court which has been pontificating on morality in public life to take suo moto cognizance of this bizzare claim and put an end to this twisitng of facts.
|