Blogs >> Miscellaneous >>
So Un'Fashionable'...
Bhandarkar has done it again. Conned critics and audiences into
thinking he has given them the real deal with a film titled (rather
obviously!) 'Fashion'. It has its powerful moments and a few searing
comments on that crazed world, but it is about as authentic a take on
the subject as Rakhi Sawant's silicon implants or Ekta Kapoor's
Mahabharata. Fully fake and somewhat faltu. But with Bollywood's
present obsession with Gays, this film too spends far too much time on
the gays in the catwalk biz than on propelling the story forward. Since
this is meant to be an insider track on the subject, I expected
something more insightful than a silly kiss-and-tell, in which the real
kick lay in trying to guess the identities of the various characters.
Is the blond Gay super bitch designer supposed to be Gudda? And is
Harsh Chhaya's lisping Gay designer based on Tarun? Or Rocky? Or
Vikram? In that case, who is the married Gay designer playing? Awww...
it could be any one of the Delhi guys - those closeted queens with
photogenic wives. But, if you are not in the know, does the film still
work?? No, not at all. There are no less than 11 fashion shows strewn
through the movie. Why not watch FTV instead? Better shows, better
outfits and genuine style??
On the upside, the performances are first rate, though Kangana HAS BEEN SADLY SHORT CHANGED. HER CHARACTER WAS SO MUCH MORE INTERESTING THAN PRIYANKA'S. But one must hand it to Piggy Chops for accepting a role that demands one hell of a lot from the actor. And she has delivered big time, even if she is badly photographed and poorly styled to pass for a supersmodel.Mugdha was the surprise package - all toothy, leggy charm while delivering gritty performance , especially for a debutante. So...are all models coked out, chain smoking wine guzzling sluts who sleep around to get ahead.... and end up dead after od-ing on substance? Are their lives really this pitiable? Well, Bhandarkar sure thinks so.And maybe he has it almost right.But a movie that runs for three hours certainly needs more than a string of familiar incidents to keep the audience awake.madhur tried to ramp up his image - literally - but the effect was as gauche as his own tux at the Dubai premiere.
Why did I punish myself by watching 'Golmal Returns'? Don't ask. That too after a posh Cartier event featuring the most astounding collection of vintage cars. Monica Bellucci did not show up because her minders warned her about bomb blasts in Mumbai. However, Imran Khan who is accustomed to worse back home, did. And frankly, I find him far cuter. So, who's complaining??
On the upside, the performances are first rate, though Kangana HAS BEEN SADLY SHORT CHANGED. HER CHARACTER WAS SO MUCH MORE INTERESTING THAN PRIYANKA'S. But one must hand it to Piggy Chops for accepting a role that demands one hell of a lot from the actor. And she has delivered big time, even if she is badly photographed and poorly styled to pass for a supersmodel.Mugdha was the surprise package - all toothy, leggy charm while delivering gritty performance , especially for a debutante. So...are all models coked out, chain smoking wine guzzling sluts who sleep around to get ahead.... and end up dead after od-ing on substance? Are their lives really this pitiable? Well, Bhandarkar sure thinks so.And maybe he has it almost right.But a movie that runs for three hours certainly needs more than a string of familiar incidents to keep the audience awake.madhur tried to ramp up his image - literally - but the effect was as gauche as his own tux at the Dubai premiere.
Why did I punish myself by watching 'Golmal Returns'? Don't ask. That too after a posh Cartier event featuring the most astounding collection of vintage cars. Monica Bellucci did not show up because her minders warned her about bomb blasts in Mumbai. However, Imran Khan who is accustomed to worse back home, did. And frankly, I find him far cuter. So, who's complaining??
|