British in partitioning India & Pakistan
In the midst of the whole
debate, the British get away with the cake. As such they not only took
all the measures, implemented all policies which were divisive but also
accepted all the demands which led to partition. In the process they
ensured that even after they leave, the interests of imperial powers,
UK-USA, in the Middle East remain safe and secure. This ensured that
they continue to dominate the area and retain their military and
political base in the region.
At concrete level on the political chessboard, Lord Curzon, the then Viceroy of India, partitioned Bengal (1904) with communal motivation and this was probably the first concrete experiment in communalizing the politics at big level. Curzon went on to declare that this is an attempt to invest in the Mussalmans of Eastern Bengal. Just a couple of years later (1906) the delegation of Muslim Landlords and Nawabs was received by Viceroy, where he declared that these Muslim elite be the representatives of Muslim community. The delegation went to ask for separate electorate for Muslims, and these separate electorates introduced later acted as the trigger to polarize the nation along religious lines. Many a members of this delegation were also part of United India Patriotic Association, an organization of Hindu and Muslim landlords and Kings which had come up in the wake of formation of Indian National Congress. Indian National Congress was critical of British and in response, this association pledged to enhance the loyalty of the people to the British crown.
MacDonald’s Communal Award of 1932 was the next step, which enhanced the communal divides. Interestingly in 1939, Congress firmly told the British that they will not join the war efforts until they are guaranteed freedom in return. And lo and behold in 1940, Jinnah comes with the demand for Pakistan at Lahore Muslim League convention. Can such things be coincidental? Demand of Pakistan may have been a bargaining counter but its timing is interesting.
No
doubt the Cabinet mission plan could have prevented partition, but it
is debatable whether it would not have sown the fissiparous tendencies
amongst the princely states and the states where Muslim League was in
majority. The other necessity which made British to partition India,
related to their strategic needs in the area. At the end of WWII, the
global power equations changed. USA and USSR both emerged as major
powers. US had posted its representative in India from 1942. With
British deciding to leave India, freedom was imperative. The British
calculation at this time was that an Undivided India with leadership of
Congress will not let Britain continue with its military bases in the
area. With USSR coming up in a big way, Mao Tse Tung rising in China
and section of Congress leadership impressed by socialism, UK-USA were
sure that India will not side with them in their global designs of
countering USSR militarily and in continuing their oil plunder in
middle east.
Somehow the plans of imperialists were immaculate. And in times to come Pakistan, where Mr. Jinnah wanted to have religious freedom, was converted into a land ruled by Mullahs, Army and American Ambassador. It was the same Pakistan which was supported to the hilt on the Kashmir issue; the idea was that US strategic interests are safe with this arrangement. It is a matter of great relief that Pakistan is struggling to come out from the vice like grip of Army, but can it shed its client state type status vis a vis US, is the million rupee question. The people of Pakistan have been big victim of Imperialist designs all through while Pakistan military has been having all the green pastures for itself.
In partitioning India, colonialists reaped rich harvest at the cost of the people of the subcontinent, millions dead, a single entity India, divided into Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. These countries keep on spending a major part of their budgets in investing in armaments and fattening of their armed forces, something which could have been meaningfully invested for the growth and development of the region. We need to wake up from the blame game and see the real culprit.
|